
Maryland in Europe Graduate Programs
Bowie State University
Intergovernmental Relations Seminar
PUAD 610
Term II: Oct. 29-Dec. 19, 2002
Tuesday and Thursday evenings, 18:00-21:00
Mildenhall, UK
Updated Schedule – See Below
INSTRUCTOR: Archie J. Twitchell, DPA
Mailing Address: supplied when available
Email Address: atwitchell@faculty.ed.umuc.edu
Consultation: Available one hour before class and by appointment (any day, anytime)
REQUIRED TEXTS:
O'Toole, L. J. Ed. (2000). American Intergovernmental Relations. Washington, DC. CQ Press.
Peterson, P. E. (1995). The Price of Federalism. Washington, DC. The Brookings Institute
SUPPLEMENTAL READINGS:
Publication Manual of the American Psychological
Association, 5th Edition. (2001).
Articles of Confederation: http://www.constitution.org/cons/usa-conf.htm
The Constitution of the U.S. http://www.constitution.org/cons/constitu.txt
Constitution of Virginia – 1776: http://www.nhinet.org/ccs/docs/va-1776.htm
2001 Statistical Abstract of U. S.: http://www.census.gov/prod/2002pubs/01statab/stat-ab01.html
More supplemental readings providing a variety of views will be made available at appropriate times.
PURPOSE: This course provides the student with the basic concepts, principles and practices of relationships among the different levels of government in the United States. The concerns addressed are: the Federal structure and the roles of the Federal government and the states as defined by the Constitution (as amended) and by interpretation of the Supreme Court. The complexities of the relationships between the states and the Federal government are explored. Other principal topics are fiscal federalism, cooperation and conflict, mandates and policy implementation. The reallocation of responsibility among the federal, state and local governments is discussed.
OBJECTIVES: At the conclusion of this course the students will understand:
The principal concepts, models and theories of Federalism
Constitutional issues in Federal-state relationships
Fiscal relationships and their impact on each level of government
Contemporary approaches to intergovernmental relations in the United States
The major issues, controversies, developments and trends in the field
Implementation issues in federal-state relationships
GRADES:
400 - 450 points equals an “A”.
350 - 399 points equals a “B”.
300 – 349 points equals a “C”.
Below 300 points equals an “F”.
REQUIREMENTS:
The midterm exam is valued at 100 points and is scheduled for 21 November.
The final exam is valued at 100 points and is scheduled for 19December.
Two projects are each valued at 50 points. Due dates are posted in the project description.
The term paper is valued at 100 points and is due Dec. 17th.
Attendance/participation is worth 50 points.
The projects and the term paper shall follow the APA Publication Manual 5th Ed.
Plagiarism is grounds for failure of the class.
Exams: The exams are composed of three parts: definitions (25 points), five short answer questions ((25 points) and two essay questions selected from among four (50 points).
The first project involves the examination of the relationships between the national government and the states as expressed in the Articles of Confederation, the Constitution and the Virginia Constitution – 1776. The paper is limited to four pages and is due Nov. 5th.
The second project involves an analysis of three important Supreme Court decisions selected from among several. The purpose is to demonstrate the role of the Supreme Court in the evolution of the respective roles of the Federal government and the states. The paper is limited to a maximum of four pages and is due November 19th.
The term paper involves the analysis of a Federal executive agency. The goal is to describe and document the agency’s intergovernmental relationships, particularly their impact of the states. Two examples are the Departments of Education and Health and Human Resources (Medicaid). Paper is due on 17 December.
Topics and Reading Assignments:
Oct. 29
Introductions and Orientation
What is IGR? What is federalism? What is public administration (PA)? Types of governments. Types of federalism.
Read: Peterson Ch 1 O'Toole # 2
Oct. 31: The focus is the evolution from confederation to federalism.
Read: The Articles of Confederation, the U.S. Constitution and the Constitution of Virginia – 1776, O'Toole # 1, 12, pp. 296-301, 305-307; Peterson pp. 45-47, 188-189
Nov. 5: Functional and Legislative Theory and models of federalism:
Focus on the distribution of power and authority among the respective parties: Federal, state and local governments.
Read: Peterson Ch 2 O'Toole # 4, 5, & 29
First project due
Nov. 7 & 12: Fiscal Federalism
Read: Peterson Ch 3, 6, & 7; O'Toole, all of part 3
Nov. 14 & 19: The role of the Supreme Court in the evolution of Federalism.
Read: Gibbons v Ogden (1803), McCulloch v Maryland (1819)
National League of Cities v Usery (1976), Garcia v San Antonio Metro (1985)
United States v Lopez (1995), Reread O’Toole Ch. 1-2
Be familiar with the language of the relevant sections of the Constitution and the logic by which the court arrived at its conclusions.
Second project due on Nov. 19. Group discussion of
the role of the courts in IGR.
Nov. 21: Midterm; introduction to policy issues
Updated Schedule --- NO Class
on Nov 28. Happy Thanksgiving!
Nov. 26: Lecture and group exercises focusing on policy issues that span jurisdictional boundaries. What is the role of the Federal government in education, welfare and mandates?
Read: Peterson Ch 4 & 5; O'Toole Ch 15, all of part 4
Supplemental reading will be provided.
Dec. 3: Continuation of policy issues areas with a focus on health, Medicare and Medicaid and unfounded mandates.
Read: Peterson Ch 8, O'Toole, all of part 5
Supplemental reading will be provided
Dec. 5: Policy issues with the focus on issues of devolution, regulation & deregulation.
Dec. 10: The influence of PIG’s, state lobbyists and other groups such as the State Attorney Generals in and the tobacco settlement.
Read O’Toole 9-11 and the supplement supplied.
Dec. 12: Review
Dec. 17: Presentations
Term papers due
Dec. 19: Final exam
Grading standards for the paper
An “A” paper demonstrates critical thinking, has flawless English and competent research with proper citations.
A “B” paper demonstrates less rigorous critical thinking, or the English is of high quality but contains errors or the research is not strong. The latter is in evidence when there are few citations or the bibliography is weak.
A “C” paper has any one of the above missing
An “F” occurs when the paper is plagiarized, is not completed, or is so flawed that minimum standards for graduate work are not met.